![]() So, how does one determine the value of a copy of Trump’s State of the Union address that was afforded to Pelosi? It can depend on a number of things, such as would the mere stationary’s value be considered since they were never “sold” to attendees. READ: Town demands school board member’s removal after her anti-cop rant about police shootings.We reinvest the proceeds into sharing untold stories of those patriotic Americans. LET has a private home for those who support emergency responders and veterans called LET Unity. One could easily determine the value of a legal marriage certificate since someone paid for a copy of it, which that act likely wouldn’t be felonious since they typically run $20 for a copy. Take for example someone tearing up a copy of a marriage certificate, which is often public record. Thus, neither of these statutes adequately protects government records.”Īccording to the language listed, the mere act of destroying these kinds of documents are criminal, but determining if they’re a misdemeanor or felony gets a little dicey. In both instances, however, proving a $100 loss, the prerequisite to a felony conviction, may be difficult. The destruction of such records may be reached under 18 U.S.C. “The taking of a public record or document is prohibited by 18 U.S.C. Welcome to 2020.Īccording to the United States Department of Justice Archives, through their listings within the Criminal Resource Manual, laws regarding the theft or destruction of public records state the following: READ: Convicted rapist, murderer released on parole… again.This violation is punishable by up to three years in prison § 2071, Section 2071 (a) when she ripped up President Trump’s State of the Union address Nancy Pelosi may have just committed a violation of 18 U.S.C. US Code prohibits the destruction of government records So, for arguments sake, we’ll observe that a copy Trump’s speech falls under that legal definition of a “public record or document”. Public records, by definition, are documents or pieces of information that are not considered confidential and generally pertain to the conduct of government.įurthermore, a State of the Union address pertains specifically to government endeavors and accomplishments. In a logical sense, it certainly seems to be the case. The legality of Pelosi’s actions would be highly contingent upon whether a copy of the president’s speech is considered a “public record or document”. The million-dollar question is whether what Pelosi did was actually illegal at the State of the Union address or simply just childish.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |